This chapter should be cited as follows:
Petrovic M, Naftalin J, Glob Libr Women's Med
ISSN: 1756-2228; DOI 10.3843/GLOWM.418513
The Continuous Textbook of Women’s Medicine Series – Gynecology Module
Volume 4
Benign gynecology
Volume Editor: Professor Shilpa Nambiar, Prince Court Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Chapter
Office Ultrasound in Gynecology
First published: March 2025
Study Assessment Option
By answering four multiple-choice questions (randomly selected) after studying this chapter, readers can qualify for Continuing Professional Development points plus a Study Completion Certificate from GLOWM.
See end of chapter for details.

INTRODUCTION
The first description of the use of ultrasound in gynecology was published in 1958, when it was used to determine the risk of malignancy of abdominal masses.1 This involved a large rudimentary transabdominal ultrasound machine that was developed with the help of an engineer from the Glasgow shipyards. In recent decades, there have been major advances in the field of gynecology, but few have as wide an impact across the specialty, particularly in the outpatient setting, as that of the developments in ultrasound. Advances in ultrasound include the advent of the transvaginal probe, increasing resolution of ultrasound images, Doppler assessment and 3D scanning. These have led to significant improvements in the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for most gynecological conditions. Beyond diagnosis, ultrasound guidance has also been shown to improve the effectiveness and safety of outpatient procedures, as well as emergency and elective gynecological operations. Ultrasound is relatively cheap, non-invasive, acceptable to most patients and already the primary diagnostic tool for most women presenting with gynecological symptoms. Furthermore, while some still consider MRI to be the gold standard in gynecological imaging, increasing numbers of studies show that the performance of high-quality ultrasound is equivalent to that of MRI in diagnosing most gynecological conditions.
More widespread use of high-quality ultrasound would have a broad range of benefits to office gynecologists and their patients, including same-day diagnosis, reduced need for diagnostic procedures, efficient resource allocation and facilitation of outpatient procedures.
Same-day diagnosis
One-stop outpatient clinics that incorporate initial assessment and point-of-care ultrasound facilitate same-day diagnosis. This can expedite treatment initiation, provide reassurance when no treatment is needed, and, in cases in which management can also be completed as an outpatient, can allow the entire patient journey to be started and concluded in one visit. This reduces social disruption for the patient and is likely to be more cost-effective for healthcare organizations, because it reduces the number of outpatient appointments required by an individual patient, thereby opening up slots for new referrals.
Diagnostics
Accurate diagnosis obtained by detailed clinical and ultrasound examination is essential in general gynecology for assessment of women presenting with early pregnancy complications, subfertility, menstrual disorders (dysfunctional bleeding, irregular bleeding, prolonged bleeding, amenorrhea, etc), pelvic pain and suspected cancer. Moreover, bimanual manipulation during a transvaginal scan allows assessment of the mobility of pelvic structures (e.g. sliding of tissue layers, adherence to surrounding organs, pain mapping), which can facilitate improved diagnostic accuracy in the context of a patient’s symptoms and ultrasound findings.2
Reduced need for diagnostic procedures
High quality leads to improved diagnostic accuracy, thereby reducing the need for diagnostic procedures and operations. Diagnostic operations carry both a clinical risk to the patient as well as a financial cost to healthcare providers. There is also an associated opportunity cost to performing large numbers of diagnostic procedures: the limited surgical time that highly trained gynecological surgeons have available is better used in performing complex therapeutic operations than potentially unnecessary diagnostic operations.
Right operation, right surgeon, right hospital, right time
With increasing sub-specialization of gynecological surgery, not all gynecological surgeons are able to perform all operations. For example, with poor-quality diagnostics, a gynecologist may discover on diagnostic laparoscopy advanced endometriosis that they are either not trained to excise or not prepared to excise because they do not have adequate support from colorectal or urological colleagues. High-quality ultrasound that can map deep infiltrating endometriosis drastically reduces the likelihood of this occurring, while facilitating referral of such a patient to centers or multidisciplinary teams with the appropriate surgical expertise to manage such cases. With appropriate diagnostics and counseling, a proportion of these patients may not be scheduled for surgery at all.
Facilitating outpatient procedures
Use of ultrasound guidance during outpatient procedures improves safety by enabling better visualization of anatomy in real-time. Recent evidence also suggests a better pain tolerance of such procedures when performed under ultrasound guidance.3 This reduces the need to perform such procedures under general anesthetic, which is more risky and disruptive for the patient and less cost-effective for healthcare providers.
In this chapter, we outline recent advances in ultrasound, discuss and illustrate their use in diagnosing common gynecological conditions, and make the case that there is no more important tool that a gynecologist could have in their office than an ultrasound machine on which they are trained to provide high-quality ultrasound.
TYPES OF ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION IN GYNECOLOGY
Transvaginal ultrasound is the first-line imaging modality in gynecology. It can provide a detailed visualization of the pelvic organs and surrounding soft tissues. Where a complete gynecological ultrasound examination would once have included just the uterus and ovaries, high-quality ultrasound can now be used to assess the upper vagina, cervix, endometrium, endometrial–myometrial junction, myometrium, parametrium, Fallopian tubes, pouch of Douglas, rectovaginal space, anterior wall of the rectum and sigmoid colon, bladder, pelvic ureters and urethra.
Transabdominal ultrasound is a useful and sometimes essential addition to transvaginal ultrasound. It may also be the primary method in situations in which transvaginal ultrasound may be inappropriate (e.g. pediatric patients, virginal introitus, severe vaginismus, patient preference) or when gynecological organs are either located entirely outside of the pelvis or are sufficiently large that they cannot be completely assessed within the field of a transvaginal probe. Examination usually requires that the bladder is filled to above the uterine fundus to optimize visualization. Adequate visualization may be affected by increased subcutaneous adipose tissue (high body mass index) or abdominal structures (e.g. enteric gas shadowing). The additional distance from the pelvic structures and reduced frequency of the transabdominal probe limits the evaluation of certain pathologies such as deep infiltrating endometriosis and adenomyosis.
Transrectal ultrasound is an alternative option in carefully selected and properly counseled patients when transvaginal ultrasound is not possible, and the images obtained are comparable to those obtained with transvaginal ultrasound.4
ADJUNCTS TO ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT
Endometrium assessment
Saline infusion is an adjunct to transvaginal ultrasound that involves instillation of saline into the uterine cavity while performing an ultrasound examination. The saline delineates the cavity, which enables the detection and assessment of intracavitary pathology (e.g. endometrial polyps, submucous fibroids, intrauterine adhesions, congenital defects and malignancy) (Figure 1).
|
|
1
Endometrial polyp visualized on ultrasound without (a) and with (b) saline infusion.
Fertility assessment
Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) is an accurate, safe and well-tolerated test for evaluation of the uterine cavity morphology and tubal patency. The procedure involves a transvaginal ultrasound assessment with concurrent injection of a contrast agent.
ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PROCEDURES
Ultrasound guidance is essential for office procedures such as insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD), endometrial biopsy, drainage of a pelvic cyst/abscess/pseudocyst, and manual vacuum aspiration. It can be also beneficial in selected outpatient hysteroscopy cases.
Insertion of an IUCD under ultrasound guidance minimizes the risks of the procedure, including misplacement and uterine perforation. Furthermore, recent evidence has shown that ultrasound guidance during IUCD insertion decreases pain, procedure time and rates of complications, with better patient satisfaction.3
Use of ultrasound guidance during endometrial biopsy enables targeted rather than blind sampling, and may reduce the need for subsequent hysteroscopy. Visualization may be further improved by simultaneous saline infusion sonography.
Pelvic cyst/abscess/pseudocyst drainage under ultrasound guidance can provide symptom relief in the outpatient setting without the requirement for a general anesthetic and surgery, while manual vacuum aspiration under ultrasound guidance is a management option for patients who wish to have surgical management after a miscarriage but want to avoid the risks of general anesthesia. The total blood loss volume is lower with manual vacuum aspiration,5 and it provides a quicker recovery, shorter hospital stay, reduced waiting time and lower costs to healthcare providers, while the rate of complications (retained tissue, etc) is similar to that when the procedure is performed under sedation/general anesthetic. Manual vacuum aspiration is also useful in an emergency setting as it can be performed safely and quickly, thereby avoiding the need for emergency surgery under general anesthetic.
Outpatient hysteroscopy is a safe, well-tolerated procedure that involves direct visualization of the uterine cavity without the need for an operating room and anesthesia. Ultrasound guidance may be used in certain cases (e.g. removal of intrauterine fibroids or adhesions) to minimize the risks of complications, including cervical trauma, uterine perforation, extended procedure time and blood loss.
ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF COMMON GYNECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
Endometrial polyps
Endometrial polyps are common uterine lesions that are present in 5.8% of premenopausal women and 11.8% of postmenopausal women.6 They are mostly benign, localized protrusions of the endometrial tissue. Histologically, endometrial polyps comprise stroma, thick-walled vessels and endometrial glands.7
Ultrasound findings include thickened endometrium (hyperechoic, heterogeneous, presence of cystic spaces), a focal echogenic area within the endometrium, an intracavitary lesion surrounded by fluid, a lesion with the ‘bright-edge sign’8 (Figure 2), and, on color Doppler, the ‘single pedicle artery sign’9 (Figure 3). Use of saline infusion sonography further increases the accuracy of diagnosis of endometrial polyps,10 and should be considered in all inconclusive cases.
2 Endometrial polyp, showing characteristic feature of bright-edge sign. | 3 Endometrial polyp, showing characteristic feature of single pedicle artery sign. |
Accurate diagnosis is important as endometrial polyps are a possible cause of irregular and heavy periods, intermenstrual bleeding, subfertility, postcoital bleeding and postmenopausal bleeding. In many cases, surgical removal is the treatment of choice; however, expectant management is increasingly being offered. Reasons for pursuing expectant management may include patient preference, lack of symptoms, failed hysteroscopic polypectomy, cervical stenosis or the presence of multiple comorbidities. Ultrasound findings can play a crucial role in determining in which women this is a safe management option. A recent study showed that cystic appearance and a mean diameter ≤ 13 mm were both associated with benignity in postmenopausal women.11 Furthermore, when the polyp mean diameter was combined with the presence of intralesional cystic spaces and the patient’s body mass index, the overall accuracy in predicting premalignant or malignant postmenopausal polyps was 92%.12
Uterine fibroids
Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas) are the most common gynecological pathology, being found in over 70% of women over the course of their lives.13 They are smooth muscle tumors that may be located within the uterine cavity (submucosal), myometrium (intramural) or uterine surface (subserosal), or they may be attached to it by a thin or broad stem (pedunculated fibroids). The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classifies leiomyomas as submucosal (Figure 4), other or hybrid.14 Submucosal leiomyomas are subcategorized as type 0 (submucosal, pedunculated intracavitary), type 1 (submucosal, < 50% intramural) or type 2 (submucosal, > 50% intramural). Other leiomyomas are further subcategorized as type 3 (100% intramural but in contact with the endometrium), type 4 (100% intramural), type 5 (subserosal, ≥ 50% intramural), type 6 (subserosal, < 50% intramural), type 7 (subserosal pedunculated) or type 8 (other e.g. cervical, parasitic). Hybrid leiomyomas affect both the endometrium and the serosa.
|
|
|
|
4
Different types of submucous fibroids seen on two-dimensional (a) and three-dimensional (b–d) imaging: Type 0 (a,b), Type 1 (c) and Type 2 (d).
On ultrasound, fibroids commonly appear as discrete, round or ovoid lesions and are often heterogeneous. They may be hypoechogenic, isoechogenic or hyperechogenic, with circumferential flow and minimal internal vascularity on Doppler examination. Shadowing is often seen, either from the edge of the lesion or from the internal structure.
Transabdominal ultrasound, 3D ultrasound and saline infusion sonography are used in addition to non-enhanced transvaginal ultrasound for ‘fibroid mapping’ – a precise assessment of the location and size of every visible fibroid. Fibroid mapping is essential for the gynecologist to determine the clinical significance of each fibroid. There are an increasing number of treatment options for fibroids, including expectant management, medical treatment (non-hormonal or hormonal) or surgical/therapeutic management, including transcervical resection, radiofrequency ablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound. The route and technique used for surgery are also variable (laparoscopic, robotic, open, vaginal). Fibroid mapping may help to determine the most effective management strategy and help individualize care.
Adenomyosis
Adenomyosis is a benign pathology that is associated with menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain and possibly subfertility. Histologically, it is characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and/or stroma within the myometrium.15 Historically, it could be diagnosed only by histological examination of hysterectomy specimens, and its estimated incidence in retrospective studies varied between 5% and 70% due to significant variation in the criteria used.16 With the evolution of imaging, adenomyosis can now be easily diagnosed without recourse to surgery.17 This has also greatly advanced our understanding of the condition.
In 2021, the international Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment group revised its definitions of the features of adenomyosis into direct or indirect.18 Direct features include the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue beyond the subendometrial layer, such as myometrial cysts (Figure 5), hyperechogenic islands (Figure 6), echogenic subendometrial lines and buds. Indirect features are those that are secondary to the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue within the myometrium: asymmetrical thickening of the myometrium (Figure 7), fan-shaped shadowing (Figure 8), globular uterus, irregular endometrial–myometrial junction (Figure 9) or interrupted endometrial–myometrial junction.
|
|
|
|
5
Myometrial cysts visualized without (a–b) and with (d) Doppler flow
|
|
6
Two-dimensional (a) and three-dimensional (b) imaging of hyperechogenic islands.
|
|
|
7
(a) True asymmetrical myometrial thickening; (b) apparent asymmetrical thickening caused by uterine contraction; (c) normal appearance of uterus (no asymmetrical thickening) following uterine contraction.
8
Fan-shaped shadowing.
|
|
9
Three-dimensional-derived coronal views of the endometrial–myometrial junction, showing normal endometrial–myometrial junction (a) and irregular endometrial–myometrial junction (b).
Diagnosis of adenomyosis requires the presence of at least one direct sign. Symptom severity appears to increase with the number of direct and indirect features identified (i.e. the extent of adenomyosis). Studies have demonstrated a statistically significant association between the ultrasound features of adenomyosis and the volume of menstrual loss19 and the severity of menstrual pain.20
Uterine cavity morphology
Use of 3D ultrasound to reconstruct the coronal plane of the uterus allows unparalleled assessment of uterine cavity morphology.21 Nowadays, 3D ultrasound is the method of choice to diagnose uterine cavity malformations (Figure 10). There are many classification systems for uterine cavity malformations, with those of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) being the most widely accepted and utilized. The ASRM Müllerian Anomalies Classification 2021 classifies Müllerian anomalies into nine categories: Müllerian agenesis, cervical agenesis, unicornuate uterus, uterus didelphys, bicornuate uterus, septate uterus, longitudinal vaginal septum, transverse vaginal septum and complex anomalies.21 The ESHRE/ESGE consensus classifies anomalies into the uterine classes normal (U0), dysmorphic (U1), septate (U2), bicorporeal (U3), hemiuterus (U4), aplastic (U5), unclassified malformations (U6), with co-existent cervical and vaginal classes.22 The main classes are divided into sub-classes describing anatomical variations with clinical significance.
|
|
|
(d) |
|
10
Three-dimensional-derived coronal views of unicornuate uterus (a), septate uterus (b), bicornuate uterus (c), uterus didelphys (d) and accessory and cavitated uterine malformation (e).
Ovarian cysts and adnexal pathology
Ovarian cysts are a common finding during pelvic ultrasound examination, and their etiology varies from physiological to complex, benign or malignant. Furthermore, they may result in acute conditions such as cyst rupture and ovarian torsion. Accurate diagnosis determines the type of further management, including any requirement for emergency surgery and/or referral to specialized teams (reproductive unit, endometriosis team, gynecology oncology team), or expectant management with or without the need for follow-up appointments.
Lesions may be divided into:
- physiological cysts: follicular cyst, corpus luteum cyst
- those with ovarian pathology: serous cystadenoma, mucinous cystadenoma, cystadenofibroma, dermoid cyst (Figure 11), endometrioma, ovarian fibroma
- those with adnexal pathology: paraovarian and fimbrial cysts, peritoneal pseudocyst, hydrosalpinx or pyosalpinx (Figure 12), hematosalpinx, tubo-ovarian abscess
- borderline ovarian tumors (Figure 13): serous, mucinous, seromucinous
- ovarian tumors
11
Examples of dermoid cysts.
|
|
12
Hydrosalpinx (a) and pyosalpinx (b).
|
|
13
Serous (a) and seromucinous (b) borderline ovarian tumors.
Standardized terminology to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors proposed by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA)23 group includes the following descriptions:
- unilocular, unilocular–solid, multilocular, multilocular–solid, solid
- content: anechoic, low level (‘ground glass’), hemorrhagic, mixed echogenicity
- solid material, papillary projections (presence, number, size > 3 mm) (Figure 14), wall irregularity
- acoustic shadows
- vascularity (1 = no flow, 2 = minimal flow, 3 = moderate flow, 4 = strong flow)
- presence of ascites
14
Ovarian tumor with papillary projections.
If the above descriptors are not applicable, then the IOTA simple rules can be used for malignancy prediction:24
- if one or more M features (M1, irregular solid tumor; M2, presence of ascites; M3, at least four papillary structures; M4, irregular multilocular–solid tumor with largest diameter ≥ 100 mm; M5, very strong blood flow [color score 4]) are present in the absence of B feature(s), the mass is classified as malignant
- if one or more B features (B1, unilocular cyst; B2, presence of solid components with largest diameter < 7 mm; B3, presence of acoustic shadows; B4, smooth multilocular tumor with largest diameter < 100 mm; B5, no blood flow [color score 1]) are present in the absence of M feature(s), the mass is classified as benign
- If both M features and B features are present, or if no M or B features are present, the result is inconclusive, and a second-stage test is recommended
For women in whom the nature of the ovarian/adnexal lesion is uncertain, and in particular for establishing the diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumor, ‘pattern recognition’, i.e. the subjective evaluation of ultrasound findings by an experienced ultrasound operator, can be utlized with high accuracy.25 This can determine whether the management can be fertility-sparing rather than radical, which is important as borderline ovarian tumors are more prevalent in women of reproductive age.
Furthermore, various risk models have been developed to differentiate benign and malignant neoplasms, such as the risk of malignancy index (RMI),26 which is a product of the ultrasound scan score, menopausal status and serum CA 125 level, and the ADNEX model (assessment of different neoplasias in the adnexa).27 However, although the algorithms may help with diagnosis, none of them approaches the accuracy of expert pattern recognition.
Endometriosis
Endometriosis is a chronic benign condition that is characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and/or stroma outside the uterus. It affects approximately 10% of women of reproductive age and girls globally, and it may be associated with severe, life-impacting pain during periods, sexual intercourse, bowel movements and/or urination, chronic pelvic pain, abdominal bloating, nausea, fatigue, and sometimes depression, anxiety and infertility.28 Accurate diagnosis of endometriosis is important for effective management, including tailored fertility counseling. Furthermore, accurate imaging provides detailed information to help determine the surgical approach (diagnostic surgery with/without minimal treatment [i.e. ablation] under a general gynecology team or complex surgery by an experienced endometriosis specialist).
In cases of suspected endometriosis, ultrasound is the first-line tool to evaluate the etiology of the woman’s symptoms and to map and determine the extent of the disease. The International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group has published a systematic approach to evaluate sonographically the pelvis in patients with suspected endometriosis.29 A four-step system was introduced, including routine evaluation of the uterus and adnexa, site-specific tenderness, assessment of the pouch of Douglas using the 'sliding sign' and the presence of deep endometriosis nodules compartmentally throughout the pelvis (Figure 15).30 The use of ultrasound for diagnosis of endometriosis requires advanced scanning skills and carefully planned timing of clinic appointments for detailed evaluation of this complex condition.
|
|
|
|
|
15
Different sites of endometriosis: endometrioma (a), rectovaginal space nodule (b), uterosacral ligament nodule (c), bladder nodule (d) and bowel nodule (e).
CONCLUSION
Improvement in ultrasound has transformed diagnosis and care within gynecology. Ultrasound is acceptable to patients, non-invasive and cost-effective, and remains the primary diagnostic tool for the office gynecologist. Moreover, it allows accurate diagnosis and disease mapping, which enables appropriate triaging, counseling and management. For the office gynecologist, ultrasound provides point-of-care diagnosis and facilitates same-day treatment and safer outpatient procedures.
PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS
- Transvaginal ultrasound should be incorporated into office gynecology consultations
- Saline infusion sonography is recommended for the detection and assessment of intracavitary pathology when unenhanced transvaginal ultrasound is inconclusive or incomplete
- Synchronized bimanual manipulation with transvaginal probe should be used to assess the mobility of pelvic structures and for precise localization of pain within the pelvis
- Fibroid mapping, involving determination of the size and location of every visible fibroid, should be the default approach in women with uterine fibroids
- Ultrasound guidance should be used for all intrauterine contraceptive device insertions and manual vacuum aspirations
- High-quality ultrasound can be used to diagnose ovarian endometriomas, deep infiltrating endometriosis and some but not all types of superficial endometriosis
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The author(s) of this chapter declare that they have no interests that conflict with the contents of the chapter.
Feedback
Publishers’ note: We are constantly trying to update and enhance chapters in this Series. So if you have any constructive comments about this chapter please provide them to us by selecting the "Your Feedback" link in the left-hand column.
REFERENCES
Donald I, Macvicar J, Brown TG. Investigation of abdominal masses by pulsed ultrasound. Lancet. 1958;1(7032):1188–1195. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(58)91905-6. PMID: 13550965. | |
Testa AC, Van Holsbeke C, Mascilini F, Timmerman D. Dynamic and interactive gynecological ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(2):225–229. doi: 10.1002/uog.7309. PMID: 19644933. | |
Baradwan S, Alshahrani MS, Alnoury A, Khadawardi K, Khan MA, Abdelkader RAA, Saleh OI, Galal HM, Mohamed SMA, Abdelhakim AM, Elgedawy AM, Elbahie AM, Gaber MA, Magdy AA, Shaheen K. Does ultrasound guidance provide pain relief during intrauterine contraceptive device insertion? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Ultrasound Med. 2023;42(7):1401–1411. doi: 10.1002/jum.16166. PMID: 36583454. | |
Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Rebarber A, Goldstein SR, Tsymbal T. Transrectal scanning: an alternative when transvaginal scanning is not feasible. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(5):473–479. doi: 10.1002/uog.110. PMID: 12768560. | |
Wen J, Cai QY, Deng F, Li YP. Manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester abortion: a systematic review. BJOG 2008;115(1):5–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01572.x. PMID: 18053098. | |
Dreisler E, Stampe Sorensen S, Ibsen PH, Lose G. Prevalence of endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding in a Danish population aged 20–74 years. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(1):102–108. doi: 10.1002/uog.6259. PMID: 19115236. | |
Tao W, Niknejad M, Sharma R, et al. Endometrial polyp. Reference article, Radiopaedia.org (Accessed on 28 Jan 2025) https://doi.org/10.53347/rID-130588 | |
Caspi B, Appelman Z, Goldchmit R, Ashkenazi M, Haruvy Y, Hagay Z. The bright edge of the endometrial polyp. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15(4):327–330. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00096.x. PMID: 10895454. | |
Timmerman D, Verguts J, Konstantinovic ML, Moerman P, Van Schoubroeck D, Deprest J, van Huffel S. The pedicle artery sign based on sonography with color Doppler imaging can replace second-stage tests in women with abnormal vaginal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(2):166–171. doi: 10.1002/uog.203. PMID: 12905512. | |
Bittencourt CA, Dos Santos Simões R, Bernardo WM, Fuchs LFP, Soares Júnior JM, Pastore AR, Baracat EC. Accuracy of saline contrast sonohysterography in detection of endometrial polyps and submucosal leiomyomas in women of reproductive age with abnormal uterine bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(1):32–39. doi: 10.1002/uog.17352. PMID: 27862503. | |
Wong M, Thanatsis N, Nardelli F, Amin T, Jurkovic D. Risk of pre-malignancy or malignancy in postmenopausal endometrial polyps: a CHAID decision tree analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(6):1094. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061094. PMID: 34203810; PMCID: PMC8232598. | |
Wong M. Ultrasound-based assessment and management of postmenopausal bleeding and endometrial polyps, PhD thesis, University College London, 2022 https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10155977/ | |
Boosz AS, Reimer P, Matzko M, Römer T, Müller A. The conservative and interventional treatment of fibroids. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111(51–52):877–883. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0877. PMID: 25597366; PMCID: PMC4298239. | |
Munro MG, Critchley HO, Fraser IS and the FIGO Menstrual Disorders Working Group. The FIGO classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2204–2208.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.079. PMID: 21496802. | |
Robboy SJ et al. Pathology of the female reproductive tract. Churchill Livingstone; 2002. | |
Azziz R. Adenomyosis: current perspectives. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1989;16(1):221–235. PMID: 2664619. | |
Naftalin J, Jurkovic D. The endometrial–myometrial junction: a fresh look at a busy crossing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(1):1–11. doi: 10.1002/uog.6432. PMID: 19565525. | |
Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, Hehenkamp WJK, Groenman F, De Bruyn C, Rasmussen C, Lazzeri L, Jokubkiene L, Jurkovic D, Naftalin J, Tellum T, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Huirne JAF. Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60(1):118–131. doi: 10.1002/uog.24786. PMID: 34587658; PMCID: PMC9328356. | |
Naftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, Mavrelos D, Foo X, Jurkovic D. Is adenomyosis associated with menorrhagia? Hum Reprod. 2014;29(3):473–479. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det451. PMID: 24408315. | |
Naftalin J, Hoo W, Nunes N, Holland T, Mavrelos D, Jurkovic D. Association between ultrasound features of adenomyosis and severity of menstrual pain. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(6):779–783. doi: 10.1002/uog.15798. PMID: 26499878. | |
Pfeifer SM, Attaran M, Goldstein J, Lindheim SR, Petrozza JC, Rackow BW, Siegelman E, Troiano R, Winter T, Zuckerman A, Ramaiah SD. ASRM Müllerian anomalies classification 2021. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(5):1238–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.025. | |
Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Brölmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2032–2044. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det098. PMID: 23771171; PMCID: PMC3712660. | |
Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Verrelst H, Vergote I and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16(5):500–505. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00287.x. PMID: 11169340. | |
Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Van Holsbeke C, Paladini D, Van Calster B, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Valentin L. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(6):681–690. doi: 10.1002/uog.5365. PMID: 18504770. | |
Yazbek J, Raju KS, Ben-Nagi J, Holland T, Hillaby K, Jurkovic D. Accuracy of ultrasound subjective ‘pattern recognition’ for the diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(5):489–495. doi: 10.1002/uog.4002. PMID: 17444554. | |
Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, Turner J, Frost C, Grudzinskas JG. A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(10):922–929. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02448.x. PMID: 2223684. | |
Van Calster B, Van Hoorde K, Valentin L, Testa AC, Fischerova D, Van Holsbeke C, Savelli L, Franchi D, Epstein E, Kaijser J, Van Belle V, Czekierdowski A, Guerriero S, Fruscio R, Lanzani C, Scala F, Bourne T, Timmerman D and International Ovarian Tumour Analysis Group. Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study. BMJ 2014;349:g5920. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5920. PMID: 25320247; PMCID: PMC4198550. | |
World Health Organization. Endometriosis. Available from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/endometriosis | |
Guerriero S, Condous G, van den Bosch T, Valentin L, Leone FP, Van Schoubroeck D, Exacoustos C, Installé AJ, Martins WP, Abrao MS, Hudelist G, Bazot M, Alcazar JL, Gonçalves MO, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Savelli L, Dunham R, Reid S, Menakaya U, Bourne T, Ferrero S, Leon M, Bignardi T, Holland T, Jurkovic D, Benacerraf B, Osuga Y, Somigliana E, Timmerman D. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):318–332. doi: 10.1002/uog.15955. PMID: 27349699. | |
Leonardi M, Condous G. How to perform an ultrasound to diagnose endometriosis. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2018;21(2):61–69. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12093. PMID: 34760504; PMCID: PMC8409846. |
Online Study Assessment Option
All readers who are qualified doctors or allied medical professionals can automatically receive 2 Continuing Professional Development points plus a Study Completion Certificate from GLOWM for successfully answering four multiple-choice questions (randomly selected) based on the study of this chapter. Medical students can receive the Study Completion Certificate only.
(To find out more about the Continuing Professional Development awards programme CLICK HERE)
