Menu

An expert resource for medical professionals
Provided FREE as a service to women’s health

The Alliance for
Global Women’s Medicine
A worldwide fellowship of health professionals working together to
promote, advocate for and enhance the Welfare of Women everywhere

An Educational Platform for FIGO

The Global Library of Women’s Medicine
Clinical guidance and resources

A vast range of expert online resources. A FREE and entirely CHARITABLE site to support women’s healthcare professionals

The Global Academy of Women’s Medicine
Teaching, research and Diplomates Association

This chapter should be cited as follows:
Ottolina J, Grisafi G, et al, Glob. libr. women's med.,
ISSN: 1756-2228; DOI 10.3843/GLOWM.420993

The Continuous Textbook of Women’s Medicine SeriesGynecology Module

Volume 8

Gynecological endoscopy

Volume Editors: Professor Alberto Mattei, Director Maternal and Child Department, USL Toscana Centro, Italy
Dr Federica Perelli, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy

Chapter

Surgical Treatment of Ovarian Endometrioma

First published: September 2024

Study Assessment Option

By completing 4 multiple-choice questions (randomly selected) after studying this chapter readers can qualify for Continuing Professional Development awards from FIGO plus a Study Completion Certificate from GLOWM
See end of chapter for details

INTRODUCTION

Endometriomas are fluid-filled ovarian cysts containing endometrial glands and stroma that affect approximately 17–44% of patients with endometriosis. Endometriomas are most often unilateral, with a mean cyst wall thickness of 1.2–1.5 mm. Bilateral endometriomas, when present, are associated with more extensive disease and posterior cul-de-sac obliteration. The left ovary is more commonly affected, with the sigmoid colon potentially preventing elimination of exfoliated endometrial fragments effluxing through the fallopian tubes during menstruation, allowing endometrial cells more opportunity to implant upon the left ovary.1

Endometriomas may affect fertility through structural damage, inflammatory changes, and diminishment of ovarian reserve.2 First, endometriomas may distort pelvic anatomy, negatively affecting the ability of the fallopian tubes to grasp an ovum. Second, endometriomas are associated with an increase in inflammatory markers in the peritoneal fluid, impairing tubal and sperm motility; the subsequent free radicals can affect embryo development. Third, endometriomas may also decrease ovarian reserve. It has been proposed that the increased fibrosis and inflammation within the ovary leads to oxidative stress and apoptosis. This oxidative stress and presence of free radicals may also affect oocyte quality; indeed, embryos from patients with endometriosis show slower development and arrest more frequently than those from patients without endometriosis. Finally, endometriomas also cause mechanical stretching of the ovarian cortex which can harm follicles.3,4

There is no standardized surgical approach to the management of endometriomas, although several different surgical techniques are described. Cystectomy has long been the favored approach for complete surgical excision due to significant evidence of improvement in symptoms and decreased risk of recurrence compared to ablation.5 However, concerns have been raised as to the possibility that surgical excision may damage the ovarian reserve, which appears to be already damaged by the presence of the endometrioma itself.6,7 Therefore, indication to surgical treatment should balance the possible risks of damaging the ovarian reserve with the advantages of surgery in terms of satisfactory pain relief rates and pregnancy rates, and of obtaining a tissue specimen to rule out the rare cases of unexpected ovarian malignancy.

SURGERY FOR ENDOMETRIOMA TREATMENT

The standard approach to ovarian endometrioma is laparoscopic excision of the cyst capsule with the stripping technique.5 Evidence-based guidelines suggest surgical excision in case of symptomatic or large (>3 cm) endometriomas.8,9

Excision of the cyst capsule with the stripping technique (cystectomy) seems to be more beneficial than drainage and ablative techniques, since it provides a higher spontaneous pregnancy rate and lower recurrence rate.9

Cystectomy involves a “stripping” technique in which a plane between the cyst wall and normal ovarian cortex is created and then further delineated using traction and countertraction with atraumatic instruments. This can be exceptionally challenging due to the fibrosis and inflammation often encountered with the endometrioma, making it difficult to develop the correct surgical plane. For this reason, surgical excision of endometriotic cysts is a complex procedure that requires adequate competence and skill, and dedicated operators.

Recently, some concerns have been raised as to the possibility that surgical excision of the endometrioma, even when surgery is performed by skilled surgeons, may negatively impact on the ovarian reserve of the operated ovary.6 This effect is thought to be related to excessive removal and thermal destruction of healthy ovarian tissue with subsequent loss of ovarian follicles.10

Concerns about ovarian failure after cystectomy resulted in the introduction of ablative techniques using energies with minor in depth thermal spread, such as CO2 laser or plasma energy. There are consistent data in the literature suggesting that this technique may represent an effective ovarian tissue-sparing technique.11,12

Ablative technique appears to destroy the filmy superficial internal lining of the cyst selectively without reaching the fibrotic capsule surrounding the endometrioma or the adjacent healthy ovarian cortex.13,14 Particularly, CO2 fiber laser vaporization may represent a more advantageous approach than other energy sources (CO2 laser in-line-of-sight or plasma laser) for several reasons. It is simple, easy to use, and has the advantage of eliminating the ‘surgeon’s experience’ factor as recently demonstrated in a study conducted by Vanni and co-workers.15 Thanks to its high precision, CO2 fiber laser vaporization provides optimal coagulation and ablation capabilities, minimizing the need for electrocoagulation or suturing. Thanks to its low thermal energy, it avoids excessive ischemia and allows safe management of delicate tissues, such as ovarian parenchyma. Moreover, the long arm of the flexible fiber allows the surgeon to reach narrow anatomical spaces, and it can be introduced in the peritoneal cavity from any laparoscopic access, allowing the surgeon the optimal approach to the operative field.

Good results in terms of postoperative pregnancy rates, recurrence risk and ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in IVF setting after ablation using energies with little thermal spread, such as CO2 laser and plasma energy, have been published.16,17

SURGICAL INSIGHTS

  • First, place the patient on the operating table with their legs placed into stirrups.
  • After administering general anesthesia, place the patient in the lithotomic position, a variation of the supine position in which the legs are separated from the midline in a 30° to 45° abduction with the hips flexed until the thighs form an angle between 80° and 100°.
  • Establish a sterile field by cleaning the following areas with a sponge soaked in antiseptic solution: the apex of the umbilicus, the abdomen, the perineum, and the top third of the thighs. Then, scrub with a gauze drenched in iodine solution the vulva and, when possible, the vaginal interior up to the cervix and discard it. Repeat this step 3x.
  • With a new sponge drenched in iodine solution, swab the anus twice and discard it. Dry the prepared external areas with a sterile towel and place sterile drapes. Insert a urethral catheter for continuous bladder drainage.
  • When possible, with the use of an anterior and posterior vaginal retractor, expose the cervix and insert the uterine manipulator into the cervix. Create a pneumoperitoneum by either a Verres needle inserted at an angle of 45° in non-obese patients to 90° in obese patients) or using the open technique (a small, 1 cm incision is made below the umbilicus on the midline). Keep the insufflation pressure between 12 mmHg and 14 mmHg.
  • Insert a laparoscope and inspect the upper and lower abdomen. After positioning the patient in a slight Trendelenburg position, place the other laparoscopic access (usually two or three).

Then, perform either CO2 fiber laser ablation or stripping technique as described below.

STRIPPING TECHNIQUE

Cystectomy consists in stripping away the cyst wall from the underlying healthy ovarian parenchyma by delicate traction and countertraction maneuvers followed by selective hemostasis. However, endometrioma is a “pseudocyst” with no clear cleavage plan, thus the risk of inadvertent removal of healthy ovarian parenchyma is higher compared to other ovarian benign cysts especially in case of surgeons without an extensive expertise in the endometriosis surgical treatment. Endometrioma cystectomy, even when performed by an expert surgeon, may lead to significant ovarian tissue removal which increases proportionally as cyst diameter increases.18 Therefore, a team of surgeons with extensive experience in the treatment of endometriosis is required in order to keep at minimum the possibility of ovarian function damage.

Surgical technique

  • Start with adhesiolysis in order to free the ovaries from the surrounding structures. Make a sharp cortical incision on the thinnest part of the cyst, just enough to identify the correct cleavage plane. Avoid making the incision close to the fallopian tube or fimbriae.
  • Take the edges of the incision with two grasping forceps and strip out the cyst from the healthy ovarian parenchyma by delicate traction and counter traction maneuvers.
  • After removal of the cyst, perform selective hemostasis with bipolar coagulation using the water test, mainly on the edges of the ovary, to reduce the risk of ovarian damage.
  • At the end of the surgery, carefully remove the uterine manipulator if positioned. Suture the fascia with a medium absorption rate braided suture size 0 and the skin with a quick absorption rate suture size 3–0. Place patches on all the incisions and remove the urethral catheter the same day of the surgical procedure.

ONE-STEP CO2 FIBER LASER VAPORIZATION

In this surgical approach, the “pseudo-capsule” is not removed but it is ablated with energies with little thermal spread. Among the several sources of energy investigated so far, CO2 fiber laser has showed promising results in the treatment of endometrioma-associated infertility. After its validation by Kaplan and his colleagues in 1973,19 from the early 1980s to the 1990s Nezhat brothers et al. had optimized the use of CO2 laser for laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis.20 CO2 lasers emit light at a wavelength of 10,600 nm that is absorbed strongly by water: radiant energy is converted to heat, instantly raising the temperature of tissue water to more than 100°C and thus vaporizing the target lesion. Compared with all available energy sources, CO2 laser is highly selective and precise, has minimal depth of tissue penetration21 and produces little lateral thermal spread, lowering the risk of unintended thermal damage produced by non-visible larger necrosis and/or deep penetration.22 Furthermore, being used in a non-contact mode, CO2 laser allows continuous visualization of the section plane between healthy and endometriosis affected tissue. These properties are of crucial importance when attempting to preserve the surrounding viable ovarian tissue. In addition, CO2 laser simultaneously cauterizes bleeding tissue making hemostasis very effective without the risks of cautery. Historically CO2 lasers used to be fixed to rigid instruments lending to ergonomic difficulties; however, newer technologies have allowed for a flexible fiber delivery system, overcoming past ergonomic challenges by providing flexibility, durability, and ease of use. Thanks to CO2 fiber laser introduction, treatment of endometriotic cysts is now allowed even by non expert surgeons.

Surgical technique

  • First, mobilize both adnexa to restore the normal anatomy of the pelvis. Then, by using an aspiration or irrigation device, drain the cyst contents and irrigate and inspect its inner wall. Take a biopsy of the cyst wall using scissors and send it for routine histological examination to confirm the diagnosis of endometriosis.
  • Select the basic operation mode and set the device to fiber laser mode with the continuous wave and constant timed-exposure mode at a power density of 13–15 W13.
  • Evert the cyst with grasping forceps in order to expose the inner cystic wall and completely vaporize the inner wall with a CO2 fiber laser in a radial way starting from the center to the periphery, keeping the tip of the fiber at a distance of at least 1 cm from the cystic surface.
  • Do not suture the ovary after vaporization. Carefully control any source of bleeding at the end of the procedure using the water test (i.e., washing the bleeding sites to visualize and achieve hemostasis selectively) or by slightly reducing the pneumoperitoneum.

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Endometriomas are fluid-filled ovarian cysts containing endometrial glands and stroma that affect approximately 17–44% of patients with endometriosis. Endometriomas may affect fertility through structural damage, inflammatory changes, and diminishment of ovarian reserve.
  • Evidence-based guidelines suggest surgery in case of symptomatic or large (>3 cm) endometriomas.
  • There is no standardized surgical approach to the management of endometriomas, although several different surgical techniques are described.
  • Cystectomy has long been the favored approach for complete surgical excision due to significant evidence of improvement in symptoms and decreased risk of recurrence compared to ablation.
  • Surgical excision of the endometrioma, may negatively impact on the ovarian reserve. This effect is thought to be related to excessive removal and thermal destruction of healthy ovarian tissue with subsequent loss of ovarian follicles. For these reasons, cystectomy is a complex procedure that requires adequate competence and skill, and dedicated operators.
  • Concerns about ovarian failure after cystectomy resulted in the introduction of ablative techniques using energies with minimal depth thermal spread, such as CO2 laser or plasma energy. this technique may represent an effective ovarian tissue-sparing technique.
  • Among the several sources of energy investigated so far, the CO2 fiber laser has showed promising results in the treatment of endometrioma-associated infertility.
  • the CO2 fiber laser, compared with all available energy sources, is highly selective and precise, has minimal depth of tissue penetration and produces little lateral thermal spread, lowering the risk of unintended thermal damage produced by non-visible larger necrosis and/or deep penetration.
  • In this approach, the inner cystic wall is completely vaporized with a CO2 fiber laser in a radial way starting from the center to the periphery, keeping the tip of the fiber at a distance of at least 1 cm from the cystic surface.
  • Good results in terms of postoperative pregnancy rates, recurrence risk and ovarian response to COS in IVF setting after ablation using energies with little thermal spread, such as CO2 laser and plasma energy, have been published.


CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author(s) of this chapter declare that they have no interests that conflict with the contents of the chapter.

REFERENCES

1

Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG. Evidence-based management of endometrioma. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;23(1):15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.013. Epub 2010 Dec 1. PMID: 21561807.

2

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012;98(3):591–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.031. Epub 2012 Jun 15. PMID: 22704630.

3

Sanchez AM, Viganò P, Somigliana E, et al. The distinguishing cellular and molecular features of the endometriotic ovarian cyst: from pathophysiology to the potential endometrioma-mediated damage to the ovary. Hum Reprod Update 2014;20(2):217–30. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt053. Epub 2013 Oct 14. PMID: 24129684.

4

Sanchez AM, Vanni VS, Bartiromo L, et al. Is the oocyte quality affected by endometriosis? A review of the literature. J Ovarian Res 2017;10(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13048-017-0341-4. PMID: 28701212; PMCID: PMC5508680.

5

Hart RJ, Hickey M, Maouris P, et al. Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(2):CD004992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004992.pub3. PMID: 18425908.

6

Benaglia L, Somigliana E, Vighi V, et al. Rate of severe ovarian damage following surgery for endometriomas. Hum Reprod 2010;25(3):678–82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep464. Epub 2010 Jan 17. PMID: 20083485.

7

Muzii L, Di Tucci C, Di Feliciantonio M, et al. Antimüllerian hormone is reduced in the presence of ovarian endometriomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2018;110(5):932–40.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.025. PMID: 30316440.

8

Leyland N, Casper R, Laberge P, et al. Endometriosis: diagnosis and management. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010;32(7 Suppl 2):S1–32. PMID: 21545757.

9

Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2014;29(3):400–12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det457. Epub 2014 Jan 15. PMID: 24435778.

10

Muzii L, Bianchi A, Crocè C, et al. Laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts: is the stripping technique a tissue-sparing procedure? Fertil Steril 2002;77(3):609–14. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)03203-4. PMID: 11872220.

11

Mircea O, Puscasiu L, Resch B, et al. Fertility Outcomes After Ablation Using Plasma Energy Versus Cystectomy in Infertile Women With Ovarian Endometrioma: A Multicentric Comparative Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016;23(7):1138–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.818. Epub 2016 Aug 20. PMID: 27553184.

12

Candiani M, Ottolina J, Posadzka E, et al. Assessment of ovarian reserve after cystectomy versus 'one-step' laser vaporization in the treatment of ovarian endometrioma: a small randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 2018;33(12):2205–11. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey305. PMID: 30299482; PMCID: PMC6238368.

13

Donnez J, Wyns C, Nisolle M. Does ovarian surgery for endometriomas impair the ovarian response to gonadotropin? Fertil Steril 2001;76(4):662–5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02011-8. PMID: 11591395.

14

Roman H, Pura I, Tarta O, et al. Vaporization of ovarian endometrioma using plasma energy: histologic findings of a pilot study. Fertil Steril 2011;95(5):1853–6.e1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.038. Epub 2010 Dec 17. PMID: 21168130.

15

Vanni VS, Ottolina J, Candotti G, et al. Flexible CO2 laser fiber: first look at the learning curve required in gynecological laparoscopy training. Minerva Ginecol 2018;70(1):53–7. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04101-6. Epub 2017 Oct 9. PMID: 28994558.

16

Candiani M, Ferrari S, Bartiromo L, et al. Fertility Outcome after CO2 Laser Vaporization versus Cystectomy in Women with Ovarian Endometrioma: A Comparative Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021;28(1):34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Jul 24. PMID: 32712323.

17

Candiani M, Ottolina J, Schimberni M, et al. Recurrence Rate after "One-Step" CO2 Fiber Laser Vaporization versus Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma: A 3-Year Follow-up Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020;27(4):901–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.027. Epub 2019 Aug 1. PMID: 31377455.

18

Muzii L, Marana R, Angioli R, et al. Histologic analysis of specimens from laparoscopic endometrioma excision performed by different surgeons: does the surgeon matter? Fertil Steril 2011;95(6):2116–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.034. Epub 2011 Mar 16. PMID: 21411079.

19

Tadir Y, Kaplan I, Zuckerman Z, Edelstein T, Ovadia J. New instrumentation and technique for laparoscopic carbon dioxide laser operations: a preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Apr;63(4):582-5. PMID: 6230550.

20

Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Nezhat C. Operative laparoscopy (minimally invasive surgery): state of the art. J Gynecol Surg 1992;8(3):111–41. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1992.8.111. PMID: 10171579.

21

Sutton C, Abbott J. History of power sources in endoscopic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013;20(3):271–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.03.001. PMID: 23659747.

22

Tulikangas PK, Smith T, Falcone T, et al. Gross and histologic characteristics of laparoscopic injuries with four different energy sources. Fertil Steril 2001;75(4):806–10. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01785-4. PMID: 11287039.

Online Study Assessment Option
All readers who are qualified doctors or allied medical professionals can now automatically receive 2 Continuing Professional Development credits from FIGO plus a Study Completion Certificate from GLOWM for successfully answering 4 multiple choice questions (randomly selected) based on the study of this chapter.
Medical students can receive the Study Completion Certificate only.

 

(To find out more about FIGO’s Continuing Professional Development awards programme CLICK HERE)